<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Useful Exercise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/</link>
	<description>Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HokiePundit (RDB) W&#38;M 1L</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13641</link>
		<dc:creator>HokiePundit (RDB) W&#38;M 1L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13641</guid>
		<description>If another American city is attacked, can we bomb Paris or Brussels?  Maybe at least with stinkbombs?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If another American city is attacked, can we bomb Paris or Brussels?  Maybe at least with stinkbombs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13640</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13640</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No responsible Commander in Chief will allow themselves to be hogtied into a nuke-or-nothing response. I think we might re-invade given the right circumstances and motivation. After all, it hasn&#039;t been that long since Desert Storm.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And we didn&#039;t abandon Desert Storm after a collapse of poliical support.  Otherwise I think this is a good, succinct statement of why it would be imprudent for us to withdraw from Iraq before it&#039;s a lot more secure than it is now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<br />No responsible Commander in Chief will allow themselves to be hogtied into a nuke-or-nothing response. I think we might re-invade given the right circumstances and motivation. After all, it hasn&#8217;t been that long since Desert Storm.<br />
</p></blockquote>
<p>And we didn&#8217;t abandon Desert Storm after a collapse of poliical support.  Otherwise I think this is a good, succinct statement of why it would be imprudent for us to withdraw from Iraq before it&#8217;s a lot more secure than it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Costin</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13639</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Costin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13639</guid>
		<description>No responsible Commander in Chief will allow themselves to be hogtied into a nuke-or-nothing response. I think we might re-invade given the right circumstances and motivation. After all, it hasn&#039;t been that long since Desert Storm. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Long term, the constant Congressional sniping and second- guessing against the President will have the opposite effect from what they expect. Whoever the next President is, they&#039;ll go into office knowing that Congress wants to run the military, and that if they want to run a war successfully they&#039;ve got to start by locking Congress out of it. The traditional deference that the President has shown to Congress brings no benefit and carries impossible risks. Executive power will end up stronger, not weaker.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No responsible Commander in Chief will allow themselves to be hogtied into a nuke-or-nothing response. I think we might re-invade given the right circumstances and motivation. After all, it hasn&#8217;t been that long since Desert Storm. </p>
<p>Long term, the constant Congressional sniping and second- guessing against the President will have the opposite effect from what they expect. Whoever the next President is, they&#8217;ll go into office knowing that Congress wants to run the military, and that if they want to run a war successfully they&#8217;ve got to start by locking Congress out of it. The traditional deference that the President has shown to Congress brings no benefit and carries impossible risks. Executive power will end up stronger, not weaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul S</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13638</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13638</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dave Schuler.  In the event of another serious attack on US soil, I think a Dresden like response is far more likely than an attempt at nation building.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Dave Schuler.  In the event of another serious attack on US soil, I think a Dresden like response is far more likely than an attempt at nation building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13637</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13637</guid>
		<description>I also think that if a nuke went off in San Francisco that we&#039;d probably nuke Tehran.  But I seriously doubt that we&#039;d invade.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think that if a nuke went off in San Francisco that we&#8217;d probably nuke Tehran.  But I seriously doubt that we&#8217;d invade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13636</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13636</guid>
		<description>I think that those things would provoke a bombing attack, John, but not an invasion.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I continue to believe that, once we&#039;ve gone, we&#039;ve gone.   And that&#039;s why I think it would be very imprudent for us to leave until things are a lot more secure in Iraq than they are right now.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Re-invading Iraq would incur responsibilities (just as invasion did, although it looks like an increasing number of American politicians are willing to ignore that) and I don&#039;t see any way, once we&#039;ve left Iraq because we don&#039;t want to deal with those responsibilities.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that those things would provoke a bombing attack, John, but not an invasion.</p>
<p>I continue to believe that, once we&#8217;ve gone, we&#8217;ve gone.   And that&#8217;s why I think it would be very imprudent for us to leave until things are a lot more secure in Iraq than they are right now.</p>
<p>Re-invading Iraq would incur responsibilities (just as invasion did, although it looks like an increasing number of American politicians are willing to ignore that) and I don&#8217;t see any way, once we&#8217;ve left Iraq because we don&#8217;t want to deal with those responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John_B</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13635</link>
		<dc:creator>John_B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13635</guid>
		<description>How about a nuke going off in SF, or a major chemical attack on Philadelphia? How about a half-dozen attacks--each with half-dozen perps--on the major shopping malls in the US?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Or maybe just an assassination of a President or a few members of Congress, say the Jewish ones, just to make sure that everyone understands that this is religiously motivated terrorism....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a nuke going off in SF, or a major chemical attack on Philadelphia? How about a half-dozen attacks&#8211;each with half-dozen perps&#8211;on the major shopping malls in the US?</p>
<p>Or maybe just an assassination of a President or a few members of Congress, say the Jewish ones, just to make sure that everyone understands that this is religiously motivated terrorism&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TallDave</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13634</link>
		<dc:creator>TallDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13634</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No, no, that didn&#039;t work so well as &#039;motivation&#039; for kicking terrorist ass.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hmm?  We invaded Afghanistan right after.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I&#039;m certainly not saying we should &lt;i&gt;let&lt;/i&gt; them do it.  But leaving AQ sanctuaries in Iraq will allow them to plan such attacks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No, no, that didn&#8217;t work so well as &#8216;motivation&#8217; for kicking terrorist ass.</i></p>
<p>Hmm?  We invaded Afghanistan right after.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly not saying we should <i>let</i> them do it.  But leaving AQ sanctuaries in Iraq will allow them to plan such attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TallDave</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13633</link>
		<dc:creator>TallDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13633</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;how do you (or do you at all) square that statement with the recent reports that aq is stronger now than it has been at any time since 9/11?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are conflicting reports.  It appears they&#039;re talking about AQ generally.  Also, even if AQ-I is stronger in an absolute sense, the ISF have grown much faster, so AQ can still be weaker in a relative sense in Iraq.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The great underpublicized accomplishment in Iraq is that we have 350,000 Muslims fighting AQ with us.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>how do you (or do you at all) square that statement with the recent reports that aq is stronger now than it has been at any time since 9/11?</i></p>
<p>There are conflicting reports.  It appears they&#8217;re talking about AQ generally.  Also, even if AQ-I is stronger in an absolute sense, the ISF have grown much faster, so AQ can still be weaker in a relative sense in Iraq.  </p>
<p>The great underpublicized accomplishment in Iraq is that we have 350,000 Muslims fighting AQ with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisha Feger</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13632</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisha Feger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesma.nexcess.net/2007/07/17/useful-exercise/#comment-13632</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m imagining...  the World Trade Center here...  In ruins... hmm...  No, no, that didn&#039;t work so well as &#039;motivation&#039; for kicking terrorist ass.  Unless you&#039;re saying we should let a skyscraper get knocked down every year or so - and that&#039;s verging on Truther territory.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m imagining&#8230;  the World Trade Center here&#8230;  In ruins&#8230; hmm&#8230;  No, no, that didn&#8217;t work so well as &#8216;motivation&#8217; for kicking terrorist ass.  Unless you&#8217;re saying we should let a skyscraper get knocked down every year or so &#8211; and that&#8217;s verging on Truther territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

