<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ye Of Little Faith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deanesmay.com/2008/04/13/ye-of-little-faith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/04/13/ye-of-little-faith/</link>
	<description>Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:55:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillINDC</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/04/13/ye-of-little-faith/#comment-154009</link>
		<dc:creator>BillINDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/04/13/ye-of-little-faith/#comment-154009</guid>
		<description>Excellent comment, Dean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent comment, Dean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/04/13/ye-of-little-faith/#comment-154007</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Esmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/04/13/ye-of-little-faith/#comment-154007</guid>
		<description>McCaffrey&#039;s always been on the pessimistic side--which doesn&#039;t make him wrong, of course, or suggest anything sinister about his analysis. He&#039;s obviously an honorable and smart man.

But I agree with your analysis: I don&#039;t think this is what&#039;s going to happen, or if it does, there will still be an elected government that works with whatever charismatic military leader keeps order.

The best hope for Iraq was liberal democracy; the worst case was something as bad or worse than Saddam. Reasonable likelihood seems a limited, illiberal electoral democracy and federation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCaffrey&#8217;s always been on the pessimistic side&#8211;which doesn&#8217;t make him wrong, of course, or suggest anything sinister about his analysis. He&#8217;s obviously an honorable and smart man.</p>
<p>But I agree with your analysis: I don&#8217;t think this is what&#8217;s going to happen, or if it does, there will still be an elected government that works with whatever charismatic military leader keeps order.</p>
<p>The best hope for Iraq was liberal democracy; the worst case was something as bad or worse than Saddam. Reasonable likelihood seems a limited, illiberal electoral democracy and federation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

