None of those who take the time to talk to an actual Imam who’s part of the Western world, or any of the actual practicing, believing, proud Muslims who comment around here would give you the time of day. As well they shouldn’t. The "facts" you spew are factoids from a paranoid, ignorant, out-of-context point of view.

Go jack off to pseudoscholars like Robert Spencer. The only Muslims who think like you are people like Bin Laden. Congrats on validating their worldview, traitor.

    Nothing you can write about me, true or false, can alter the accuracy of the relevant, verifiable facts I have presented. No matter how intensely you mock and revile me, you can’t alter the fact that 8:39 commands warfare against pagans until only Allah is worshiped  on a global scale. You can’t alter the fact that 9:29 commands warfare against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and extorted. You can’t alter the fact that Moe confirmed those commands in ahadith, including  Bukhari 1.8.387, Bukhari 4.52.196,  &   Abu Dawud 14.2635.

    Nothing you write about me can change the fact that Islamic law based on 9:29 obligates the Caliph to attack the Kuffar at least once in every year, as I previously proved from Reliance of the  Traveler.   Nor can you erase the parallel rulings of Al Ghazali & Al-Shafi’i.

…one must go on jihad (i.e., warlike razzias or raids) at least once a year…

Al-Shafi’i (God have mercy on him) said: "The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse."

    When Jefferson and Adams asked Tripoli’s Ambassador to London by what right they attacked our shipping …

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. [Wikipedia]

See how well that diplomatic answer meshes with  what  Al-Mughira said to the Persian General.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master." [Bukhari 4.53.386]

    You are unable to meet the challenge of the relevant, verifiable facts I have presented. You can’t disprove what is recorded in the Qur’an & Hadith. You can’t disprove what is recorded in Islamic jurisprudence. You are in the unenviable position of defending a barbarian war cult founded  1398 years ago for the purpose of enriching & empowering its founder through the professional practice of piracy.  Neither can you erase the historical record of barbarian conquest which assembled an empire stretching from the border of China to the border of France.

    Effective defense against Islam is impaired by those Dhimmis who make false apology for Islam and those elected leaders who refuse to acknowledge the identity and nature of the predatory institution which is waging war against us.

Argumentum Ad Hominem is a classic logical fallacy. Now, the interesting thing about logical fallacies that most people don’t understand is that they are often quite true, and quite accurate. Go ahead, look it up if you don’t believe me.

Essentially, it’s not that you’re spouting complete lies, but rather, the most effective form of lie: a half-truth. You do what Neo-Nazis do to Jewish literature and Jewish history. You do what some Christophobes do to Christians, too. There are numerous answers to the silliness you spout, but it requires you to make a good faith, honest effort to understand them. Clearly, you do not.

Thus, an argument ad hominem is the appropriate response: you are un-American, you are a traitor to the war against terror, and you are a fool no better than the likes of Fred Phelps or your average Neo-Nazi. You’re worse than a fool, you’re a hatemonger who hurts the war effort.

   Instead of responding to facts, you engage in argumentum ad hominem.  Allah is on record commanding Muslims to fight pagans until only Allah is worshiped. Allah is on record commanding Muslims to fight "people of the book" until they are subjugated and extorted. Moe is on record saying that he was commanded to fight with men until they testify that only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  Moe is on record saying that our blood and property become sacred to Muslims when we become Muslims; that we protect ourselves from him by joining him.  You can’t deal with these fatal facts.

Anyone who says there’s no such thing as Islamophobia, or that it’s a "nonsense word," only have to read the pseudoscholarly “reasoning” of people like this.

So which of the three I mention above is the “Dajjal” do you think: the militant atheist, or the perturbed Christian? I rather doubt he’s actually been to any Muslim countries, so that seems least likely.