As consistent as Jell-O, and whatever the politics of the moment demand. Tragically, Senator Clinton lost her party’s nomination precisely because she was more principled than Senator Obama.
Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.
Support Dean’s World
{ 4 comments }
One interesting side note is that in the video going back to ‘03 when he wasn’t even a Senator-elect he was already acting like a Senator.
Respectfully call BS on:
"Tragically, Senator Clinton lost her party’s nomination precisely because she was more principled than Senator Obama."
1. It wasn’t a tragedy, it was a fairly predictable outcome for a party vested in the identity of victimhood; the one who was part of the more victimized group wins. That’s what makes them feel good.
2. The two words "Clinton" and "principled" do not belong in the same sentence without spelling out the prinicple.
Oh, come on, the Clinton dynasty is effectively over. Do we keep having to throw dirt on them?
I personally don’t believe the Clinton dynasty IS over, particularly if O loses, but:
"Tragically, Senator Clinton lost her party’s nomination precisely because she was more principled than Senator Obama"
clearly says Clinton is more prinicpled than Obama. I don’t think Obama has enough experience under his belt for his princples to be compared to Clinton’s, unless I know what princples are being compared; I’ve got a pretty good idea of her’s based on her track record.
Comments on this entry are closed.