<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In love with lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/</link>
	<description>Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrogge</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160814</link>
		<dc:creator>jrogge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160814</guid>
		<description>Springsteen pulled this crap on Reagan too. It means nothing look how Reagan destroyed the competition. It&#039;s all the same crap all over again, every year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Springsteen pulled this crap on Reagan too. It means nothing look how Reagan destroyed the competition. It&#8217;s all the same crap all over again, every year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin L. Shoemaker</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160808</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin L. Shoemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160808</guid>
		<description>You have any proof? Or do we just accept rumors as criminal convictions these days? Your own citation disproves the rumor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have any proof? Or do we just accept rumors as criminal convictions these days? Your own citation disproves the rumor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tipper</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160795</link>
		<dc:creator>Tipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160795</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;or Jackson Browne is just in favor of censorship&lt;/em&gt; - take your pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>or Jackson Browne is just in favor of censorship</em> &#8211; take your pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tipper</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160794</link>
		<dc:creator>Tipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160794</guid>
		<description>JJ suing? McCain just got the youth vote.


&quot;But not nearly as reprehensible as letting Daryl Hannah get away.&quot;

That&#039;s sick. He beat her. Alas, he&#039;s sue happy.

&quot;Browne&#039;s attorney, Lawrence Iser, said that he demanded in a letter to TBS that it &quot;cease and desist&quot; airing the program again &quot;until false and defamatory scenes accusing Mr. Browne of assaulting actress Daryl Hannah are removed.&quot; &quot;Mr. Browne has never assaulted Daryl Hannah. Ms. Hannah never filed a police report claiming such an assault and Mr. Browne was never arrested for or charged with such an assault,&quot; a spokesman for the singer said. Hannah was a former girlfriend of both Browne and Kennedy.&quot;

black eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ suing? McCain just got the youth vote.</p>
<p>&#8220;But not nearly as reprehensible as letting Daryl Hannah get away.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s sick. He beat her. Alas, he&#8217;s sue happy.</p>
<p>&#8220;Browne&#8217;s attorney, Lawrence Iser, said that he demanded in a letter to TBS that it &quot;cease and desist&quot; airing the program again &quot;until false and defamatory scenes accusing Mr. Browne of assaulting actress Daryl Hannah are removed.&quot; &quot;Mr. Browne has never assaulted Daryl Hannah. Ms. Hannah never filed a police report claiming such an assault and Mr. Browne was never arrested for or charged with such an assault,&quot; a spokesman for the singer said. Hannah was a former girlfriend of both Browne and Kennedy.&#8221;</p>
<p>black eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin L. Shoemaker</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160788</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin L. Shoemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160788</guid>
		<description>AboutÂ as reprehensible as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/archives2/022610.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Senator Obama&#039;s misappropriation of Star Trek&lt;/a&gt;.


But not nearly as reprehensible as letting Daryl Hannah get away.

And if it seems like I&#039;m not giving this matter the serious consideration that it deserves: yes, I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AboutÂ as reprehensible as <a href="http://www.pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/archives2/022610.php" rel="nofollow">Senator Obama&#8217;s misappropriation of Star Trek</a>.</p>
<p>But not nearly as reprehensible as letting Daryl Hannah get away.</p>
<p>And if it seems like I&#8217;m not giving this matter the serious consideration that it deserves: yes, I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Coleman</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160785</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160785</guid>
		<description>No!Â Â  Read the post, Ken.Â  It was stupid.

Was it &lt;strong&gt;reprehensible&lt;/strong&gt;, though?

&lt;em&gt;Ron Coleman&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/08/13/fairness-where-is-they-sting/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;?Fairness,? where is they sting?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No!Â Â  Read the post, Ken.Â  It was stupid.</p>
<p>Was it <strong>reprehensible</strong>, though?</p>
<p><em>Ron Coleman&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/08/13/fairness-where-is-they-sting/' rel="nofollow">?Fairness,? where is they sting?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenmccracken</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160779</link>
		<dc:creator>kenmccracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/08/14/in-love-with-lawyers/#comment-160779</guid>
		<description>Was it wise to lift music from an arch-leftist in the first place?

What, was Lee Greenwood unavailable or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it wise to lift music from an arch-leftist in the first place?</p>
<p>What, was Lee Greenwood unavailable or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

