<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s New Web Browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/</link>
	<description>Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:24:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shaw</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161698</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161698</guid>
		<description>So far, I hate it.Â  But only because it crashes every time I try to go into the options menu.

That&#039;ll probably be fixed in a later release, but it&#039;ll still take a lot to get me off Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, I hate it.Â  But only because it crashes every time I try to go into the options menu.</p>
<p>That&#8217;ll probably be fixed in a later release, but it&#8217;ll still take a lot to get me off Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161670</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161670</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080903-google-on-chrome-eula-controversy-our-bad-well-change-it.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google on Chrome EULA controversy&lt;/a&gt;

Google&#039;s new web browser Chrome is fast, shiny, and requires users to sign their very lives over to Google before they can use it. Today&#039;s Internet outrage &lt;em&gt;du jour&lt;/em&gt; has been Chrome&#039;s EULA, which appears to give Google a nonexclusive right to display and distribute every bit of content transmitted through the browser. Now, Google tells Ars that it&#039;s a mistake, the EULA will be corrected, and the correction will be retroactive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080903-google-on-chrome-eula-controversy-our-bad-well-change-it.html" rel="nofollow">Google on Chrome EULA controversy</a></p>
<p>Google&#8217;s new web browser Chrome is fast, shiny, and requires users to sign their very lives over to Google before they can use it. Today&#8217;s Internet outrage <em>du jour</em> has been Chrome&#8217;s EULA, which appears to give Google a nonexclusive right to display and distribute every bit of content transmitted through the browser. Now, Google tells Ars that it&#8217;s a mistake, the EULA will be corrected, and the correction will be retroactive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161667</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161667</guid>
		<description>After thinking it in Dean I can&#039;t disagree. Tracking and storing information is what Google does.

I think a only fool would trust Google. Using a Google browser is like sending a rabbit to the store for a head of lettuce. The lettuce being your browsing habits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thinking it in Dean I can&#8217;t disagree. Tracking and storing information is what Google does.</p>
<p>I think a only fool would trust Google. Using a Google browser is like sending a rabbit to the store for a head of lettuce. The lettuce being your browsing habits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161660</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Esmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161660</guid>
		<description>Security vulnerabilities are a fact of life; it&#039;s one of the reasons there are constant updates to things like Firefox and IE. Since this browser is stll in beta, I&#039;m not inclined to be all too concerned that it&#039;s not a safe product. I am more interested in concerns that Google is tracking too much information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security vulnerabilities are a fact of life; it&#8217;s one of the reasons there are constant updates to things like Firefox and IE. Since this browser is stll in beta, I&#8217;m not inclined to be all too concerned that it&#8217;s not a safe product. I am more interested in concerns that Google is tracking too much information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161655</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161655</guid>
		<description>I got it working, but it is a bit hard to get used to.

Still I don&#039;t think it is a safe browser. Here are some of the vulnerabilities from Zdnet.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1843&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Chrome vulnerable to carpet-bombing flaw&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1847&amp;tag=nl.e550&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DoS vulnerability hits Googleâ€™s Chrome, crashes with all tabs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got it working, but it is a bit hard to get used to.</p>
<p>Still I don&#8217;t think it is a safe browser. Here are some of the vulnerabilities from Zdnet.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1843" rel="nofollow">Google Chrome vulnerable to carpet-bombing flaw</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1847&amp;tag=nl.e550" rel="nofollow">DoS vulnerability hits Googleâ€™s Chrome, crashes with all tabs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mc Kiernan</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161652</link>
		<dc:creator>Mc Kiernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161652</guid>
		<description>Okay, 

McK  swallows  the poisoned bait again..

He harve very poor opinion... 

errrp ...   google. 

If&#039;n you wanna talk non-persons, marxism, commies and  kapitalists fer a cause, silent Krystal-nacht all rolled into one    --- ergo ---  das  ein google.

From Google headquarters--- a couple of  kilometers from one&#039;s  abode, their stated mission is:

&quot; Google&#039;s mission is to organize &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/corporate/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;the world&#039;s information&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and make it universally accessible and useful.  &quot;

Translation:   We are going to get every digital byte of information off yorn  &lt;strike&gt;personal&lt;/strike&gt; computer we are hack and turn it into our profit.

From Google corporate Headquarters/culture statement erst  this profound statement for the internet dorks (&lt;strike&gt;us&lt;/strike&gt;) dumb enough to go on the internet:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/corporate/culture.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot; Nearest 24 hour donut shop is Krispy Kreme&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

One day, ppls is gonna find out there jest ain&#039;t no privacy.


  &#160;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/corporate/culture.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;  &#160;

Caveat Emptor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, </p>
<p>McK  swallows  the poisoned bait again..</p>
<p>He harve very poor opinion&#8230; </p>
<p>errrp &#8230;   google. </p>
<p>If&#8217;n you wanna talk non-persons, marxism, commies and  kapitalists fer a cause, silent Krystal-nacht all rolled into one    &#8212; ergo &#8212;  das  ein google.</p>
<p>From Google headquarters&#8212; a couple of  kilometers from one&#8217;s  abode, their stated mission is:</p>
<p>&quot; Google&#8217;s mission is to organize <a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/index.html" rel="nofollow"><em>the world&#8217;s information</em></a> and make it universally accessible and useful.  &quot;</p>
<p>Translation:   We are going to get every digital byte of information off yorn  <strike>personal</strike> computer we are hack and turn it into our profit.</p>
<p>From Google corporate Headquarters/culture statement erst  this profound statement for the internet dorks (<strike>us</strike>) dumb enough to go on the internet:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/culture.html" rel="nofollow">&quot; Nearest 24 hour donut shop is Krispy Kreme&quot;</a></p>
<p>One day, ppls is gonna find out there jest ain&#8217;t no privacy.</p>
<p>  &nbsp;  <a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/culture.html" rel="nofollow"><br />
</a>  &nbsp;</p>
<p>Caveat Emptor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161640</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Esmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161640</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t look anything like my copy of Firefox, which I&#039;m pretty sure is the latest. But I would expect them to have used open source code for a lot of it, so I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it shares chunks of the same code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t look anything like my copy of Firefox, which I&#8217;m pretty sure is the latest. But I would expect them to have used open source code for a lot of it, so I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it shares chunks of the same code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161637</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161637</guid>
		<description>I am told some has been copied some from Mozilla (which it looks like) because Mozilla is open source, and from Safari.

You may get a trojan warning from your anti-virus, but that is the Google Updater which uses protocols that of a trojan to communicate with its&#039; [Googles] server. But a fellow at my tech hangout &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.invisionmodding.com/index.php?s=&amp;showtopic=29661&amp;view=findpost&amp;p=136391&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;says there is still a security risk&lt;/a&gt;.

However it won&#039;t install on my system for some reason, but it looks nice from what I can see of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am told some has been copied some from Mozilla (which it looks like) because Mozilla is open source, and from Safari.</p>
<p>You may get a trojan warning from your anti-virus, but that is the Google Updater which uses protocols that of a trojan to communicate with its&#8217; [Googles] server. But a fellow at my tech hangout <a href="http://www.invisionmodding.com/index.php?s=&amp;showtopic=29661&amp;view=findpost&amp;p=136391" rel="nofollow">says there is still a security risk</a>.</p>
<p>However it won&#8217;t install on my system for some reason, but it looks nice from what I can see of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLBussey</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161633</link>
		<dc:creator>JLBussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161633</guid>
		<description>Ah, Google has had a web browser in the pipeline.Â  This explains why sites that use Google Analytics hang for 10+ seconds in Firefox...

&lt;em&gt;JLBussey&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://jlbussey.typepad.com/ce/2008/09/theyre-starting-to-change-color-already.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;They&#039;re Starting to Change Color Already&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Google has had a web browser in the pipeline.Â  This explains why sites that use Google Analytics hang for 10+ seconds in Firefox&#8230;</p>
<p><em>JLBussey&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://jlbussey.typepad.com/ce/2008/09/theyre-starting-to-change-color-already.html' rel="nofollow">They&#8217;re Starting to Change Color Already</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161632</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Esmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2008/09/06/googles-new-web-browser/#comment-161632</guid>
		<description>By the way, have you noticed that Java is really coming into its own now? It was ridiculous 10 years ago to think it would replace traditional apps, but now it&#039;s not ridiculous at all. The applications that require the most horsepower don&#039;t necessarily use it, but most things people do these days don&#039;t require massive horsepower in today&#039;s terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, have you noticed that Java is really coming into its own now? It was ridiculous 10 years ago to think it would replace traditional apps, but now it&#8217;s not ridiculous at all. The applications that require the most horsepower don&#8217;t necessarily use it, but most things people do these days don&#8217;t require massive horsepower in today&#8217;s terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

