The Lives of Others

by Celia Farber on September 18, 2008

in Politics

Don’t even think about calming down. We should all be apoplectic. Or are you afraid of the school yard bully? Remind yourself where this kind of thing can wind up, or go back and read Martin Niemoller’s poem “First They Came.”

I rarely partake in either political discussions or mob rage, but what has transpired with the Palin “hacker,” and Gawker, is to my mind the very dead end, the very suicide, of the media cogniscenti, of anybody who touches it with a bargepole, or pretends it is anything short of a lynching of everything this country aims to stand for.

This is not “hacking.” That sounds kind of cute, like surfing, like something faintly nerdy and ingenious. The word is “surveillance,” and the cultures that invented it and perfected it were dictatorships, most of which have crumbled and fallen into the dust of history. This is what secret police do–most famously the Stasi of the blessedly vanquished “GDR,” whose stated goal was “to know everything,” and who elevated surveillance and the violation of citizens’ privacy to pornographic heights. They hold up their specks of Palin’s supposed malfeasance (ranging from trivial to indecipherable, compared to the wild crime exploited to obtain it) in tweezers under censor’s lamps, snorting “aha!” and expecting us to be scandalized and impressed.

I don’t care what they found. There is a line in the sand, on one side democracy, decency, freedom, on the other, fascism, indecency, slum, and terror. Gawker, and the media that remain enslaved by the myth of their legitimacy, have crossed the line. Whether Gawker broke the law, is not as important as whether they broke everything else. These are the people who would have us believe that their contempt for the Bush administration is largely rooted in the “destruction of civil liberites” in this country, post 9/11.

And I agreed with them–with the “liberal left”– on this. If America becomes a surveillance state, it ceases to be. The terrors began with the PC thought police, the academic purges, the media assassinations…they continued through the Kenneth Starr inquisitions, and then again, in a new form, with the myriad civil liberties erosions after 9/11.

But time and again, people keep silent, so long as their team scores, seemingly not realizing that when freedom is eroded and nobody reacts, everybody loses, now or later.

“When they came for me there was no one left to speak out.”

Don’t take the bait of imagining this is “about” Sarah Palin, or this election. It’s about an elemental freedom of expression–the freedom to send and receive email privately, for God’s sake. Here you have the king dogs of media thinking it’s “reporting” to re-print criminally hacked email, which is almost tantamount to announcing: Let’s have a full on surveillance state, where nobody is safe, where anybody’s private communications can wind up on global websites, (and the “poster” will even earn royalties by the hit.)

Did I miss it? Did the ACLU call for a massive boycott of Gawker and every other media outlet that is partaking in this rape of a citizen’s right to privacy?

As the British would say: Not bloody likely.

There is one thing I despise above all else on earth, and that is violation of privacy. I believe that to invade another person’s privacy is a form of murder–a medium for denigration.

I visited Gawker perhaps a dozen times over the past couple of years, trying to understand what the fuss was all about. I responded each time with the predictable sensations: Elevated attention, apprhension, dread. It’s “well written,” but so rigidly orthodox and post-PC conformist in everything it touches, you wish you could de-camp to Alaska and watch how a moose moves.

“This is fascism,” I said to myself. “This site, in spirit, and in essence, is fascist. It believes in the humiliation of the weak, the gang beating of everything strange, different, other.”

I kept my views to myself.

Now my un-expressed thought is confirmed, hideously.

I hope Obama comes out and denounces this, as strongly as he has ever denounced anything. This is the most important issue facing American society, outside of immediate survival: The concept of individual liberty, and the strongest possible resistance to fascism in all its modern guises, perhaps most urgently, media fascism, made so much easier by emerging technologies.
Let’s hope their smell jars, barber-chairs, and hidden microphones some day become the fossilized artifacts of a sunken world, like the former Stasi headquarters in Berlin, now a museum for gawking tourists who simply can’t believe these freaks were ever so obsessed with the lives of others.

{ 15 comments }

1 TexasAg03 September 18, 2008 at 11:30 pm

Very well said.  I too think this is the most disgusting thing I have ever seen in the political arena.  I don’t know if there is any connection with the Obama campaign – I don’t really think so, but we know so little about him and how he rose to his current position so very quickly.  

Think about this:

HE BEAT THE CLINTONS!

That’s no small feat for a man with less than four years in the Senate (less than two if you consider the time spent campaigning).I also agree that he should denounce this very forcefully.  If he doesn’t do it by tomorrow at noon, then he has waited too long and, as far as I am concerned, has condoned the behavior.  

I hope neither he nor his campaign had anything to do with this – I really do.

2 Dean Esmay September 18, 2008 at 11:38 pm

Is there a story in the news about this that I’ve missed today? Crap, I gotta go to bed but I’ll be surfing for it tomorrow…

3 Dean Esmay September 19, 2008 at 1:24 am

Oh, stupid me, Dave Price linked it directly below Celia’s piece.

I’m not surprised by this honestly. We saw similar shenanigans during the 2008 election. This is despicable behavior.

4 Scott September 19, 2008 at 4:13 am

There is no apparent link to Obama, but considering his action wire instructing  his cult-like followers to flood a radio station’s phone lines and read a prepared script written by the action wire team I wouldn’t put it past him.  Obama and his campaign have elevated creepy dirty political tricks to make even Richard Nixon deep green with envy.

5 Kristian H September 19, 2008 at 8:06 am

I’m not surprised by this honestly. We saw similar shenanigans during the 2008 election. This is despicable behavior.

2008 election? The primary, or did I miss something?

Kristian H’s last blog post..The Sagan Diary, Stardust

6 J.A. Eddy September 19, 2008 at 8:52 am

I do believe Dean meant the 2006 campaigns

7 zach September 19, 2008 at 9:46 am

J.A.,

2004 campaigns?  I guess every campaign season would probably qualify.

8 Martin L. Shoemaker September 19, 2008 at 9:52 am

Bravo, Celia!

As for the rest: there’s still no evidence linking this to the Obama campaign. "I wouldn’t put it past him" is the sort of rationalization that leads to justifying — well, justifying acts like hacking email, because "we know there’s gotta be dirt there."

But I do agree that if Senator Obama doesn’t come out — today – and publicly condemn this and everyone who is cheering it on and trying to use it against Governor Palin, then he’s a politically naive fool, and he deserves to lose. These people are the Nixons and Liddys of the digital age, and he needs to distance himself from them in no uncertain terms.

9 Dean Esmay September 19, 2008 at 10:33 am

Er, sorry, I meant 2004, a year in which we saw police physically assaulted, hack threats against prominent bloggers, and more.

10 Mary Madigan September 19, 2008 at 10:42 am

Yes, Bravo Celia!

This really is a bigger issue than Obama vs. McCain. Our media really does believe that they’re above the law, and they have no respect at all for our privacy.

Some democrats are dumb enough to defend the press in this case because they believe the press is on their side, but they forget about how the press joined with Ken Starr in his efforts to destroy and humiliate Bill Clinton.  They also forget about how nasty the press was towards Chelsea Clinton when she was younger.  The enemy of their enemy is not their friend.

They only differ from the Stasi in one way – they are vulnerable to public outrage.  They need to see tons of critical blogposts , they need to get lots of letters and they need to lose a lot of ad revenue before they’ll learn.

11 Sigivald September 19, 2008 at 3:04 pm

The ACLU attacks state action it finds repugnant to civil liberties.

The crackers who did this are not the State or its agents or even agents of a political party (despite the fact that they have an obvious political agenda – I’ve no reason at all to think the Democratic Party supported or supports them or their efforts). Nor is Gawker any of the above.

The ACLU naturally hasn’t had a comment on it, because it’s outside of their purview – and because while it’s reprehensible to reprint things that are best left private, it’s also protected by the First Amendment under current jurisprudence. (Such as there is held to be a general right to privacy, it applies only to state action, just as a private property owner can muzzle your speech on his property in general.)

There might be a tort against Gawker, but there’s no Constitutional or Civil Liberties issue.

(Likewise, I think all comparisons with the Stasi or Fascism are overblown and perhaps contrary to the point; the State had nothing to do with this (and in fact if it can find the perpetrator, the State will be punishing it this is more like classic yellow journalism, with a criminal edge on the part of the crackers.

I’m not sure Gawker’s spirit is "fascist" so much as "chav" or "utterly without decency". They’re more like Senator McCarthy at his worst (and without the excuse of there really being Communists in the State Department).)

12 Celia Farber September 19, 2008 at 3:23 pm

Sigivald,

You’re right, and I stand corrected. I din’t think of that basic distinction about the ACLU for example.  However, let me argue differently: Maybe we are both right. What I am saying is that the persecuting, surveillance-hungry, privacy eroding, humiliating, shaming, gotcha spirit is everywhere, and one should’t necessarily watch for it only from the "state." 

 It’s in academia, the media, the workplace, the corporate world…and the point I suppose is how those organs may be fed by the state’s interests, and vice versa.

The media cogniscenti cannot claim indignation and horror at "wiretapping" and erosions of civil liberties, and NOT condemn this outright.  Never mind that it wasn’t perpetrated by the "state." 

It is the principle of surveillance and invasion of privacy we are talking about. Either we are opposed to illegal surveillance–to a kultur of surveillance–or we are not. When they (Gawker et al) point to the fruits of surveillance–what can be gleaned–they have lost all. That is precisely the best argument of the best fascists. "But look what you can find!"

I dare not draw the line only at state surveillance. I wish to scream bloody murder at any instance of privacy destruction, or destruction of individual rights and freedoms, by state, by media, by academia, or by any other medium.  (Let’s throw in divorces, celebrity invasion, and whatever else you got.) I say the best people in this world are the ones who are best at minding their own business.

13 Dean Esmay September 19, 2008 at 6:49 pm

Er, I hate to nit-pick, but the ACLU often goes after private companies and organizations that it perceives to be threatening civil liberties as they see them.

14 jrogge September 20, 2008 at 1:48 am

The problem here is if we acknowledge this guy then we have to acknowledge the thousands of "Yahoo" accounts that have gotten hacked over time. This opens up a can of worms no matter what.

If Palin prosecutes to the full extent of the law (I believe hacking is considered a terrorist act now) then she’ll be labeled a fascist. If Obama denounces the behavior it will make it seem like he is somehow associated with it on some level. I will be very surprised if this is not treated like a dead horse and buried as fast as possible by both candidates.

15 ArnoldHarris September 20, 2008 at 8:44 am

Calm down, Celia. You always offend too easily. And it’s only a political campaign.

Besides, being victimized this way attracts the sympathy vote.

Arnold Harris
Mount Horeb WI

Comments on this entry are closed.

traffic stats