I can’t say why I’m voting for McCain because I’m against Obama much more than I’m for McCain. McCain was a distant third choice for me in the Republican primaries, and not because I was radically in favor of my first and second choices (I had significant reservations about supporting either Thompson or Giuliani). But I consider Obama unacceptable.
- His tax plan.
- Raising marginal tax rates screws up incentives and hurts economic growth.
- Raising taxes on savings and investment also hurts economic growth, and makes it harder for middle-class Americans to accumulate wealth, thus leaving us dependent on the government for our retirements.
- Obama’s tax plan also shifts the tax burden even more disproportionally onto the top fifth of the population, and I don’t believe it’s healthy for a democracy if 80% of the population does not share the cost of the policies they vote for.
- This is selfish of me, but I am one of the 14% of Americans whose taxes will go up under Obama’s plan. I make a decent income in an area with a very high cost of living, I save and invest a large percentage of my income (towards retirement and towards a downpayment on a house), and as a renter and a bachelor I am eligible for very few deductions and credits.
- His economic agenda. He has not said he wants to nationalize the Health Care and Financial sectors of the economy, but his announced policies are a major step in that direction. I don’t want my medical care, my personal finances, and my retirement plan to become even more politicized than they are now. I want to be free to make my own decisions and take my own risks, and I don’t mind bearing the consequences when I make a mistake.
- Entitlement reform. Obama’s plan for entitlements is to try to tax our way out of insolvency, which I don’t think is wise, or even viable. Obama also plans to create new entitlement programs, which is the precise opposite of what we should be doing: reining in the rate of growth of existing entitlement programs to a sustainable level.
- Foreign policy. Obama strikes me as being dangerously close to committing to negotiation as our only foreign policy tool. Maybe pragmatism would force President Obama to abandon his anti-war roots, but I’m afraid of taking the chance.
- His taste in colleagues. I don’t know of any evidence that Obama shares the radical views of Bill Ayers or Jeremiah Wright, or that he shares the corruption of Tony Rezko. But all three are long-term associates of Obama whom he only distanced himself from when they became major political embarassments to him. One of Bush’s major flaws as President was that he tended to appoint the wrong people and support them for too long after it became clear they were the wrong people; I fear Obama shares that flaw.
- Judicial nominations. During his campaign, Obama made the following statement on how he decides if someone is qualified for the Supreme Court:”We need somebody who’s got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it’s like to be a young teenage mom. The empathy to understand what it’s like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled, or old. And that’s the criteria by which I’m going to be selecting my judges.”
Call me old-fashioned, but I believe we should pick judges who understand the law and the constitution and will interpret it as written.
I won’t link to McCain’s donations page because McCain is taking federal funding for his general election campaign. Instead, here are the donations pages for the National Republican Congressional Committee and the Club for Growth.


{ 1 trackback }
{ 15 comments }
Great post. I don’t know if Obama’s unacceptability will be enough to get me to vote for McCain, especially because I live in Chicago where my vote won’t make a difference even in the local races, but I agree 100% with all of the above.
I agree with your points 100%. And as far as taxes go my husband and I will barely squeak into Obies increases and with today’s cost of living and the kids we want – 4 – that income is arguably middle class.
Paul I live in NE where my vote will certainly make no difference, but I still will vote for McCain. If at least to add on to the "popular" vote the Dems cried so much about in 2000.
One thing I’ll add: I’m voting for McCain to invoke partial gridlock (despite what the Libertarians and Paleo Cons say absolute gridlock <i>would</i> be bad for the country). It’s very likely that The Democrats will hold both houses after the election. In fact, they are talking about a filibuster-proof majority in their official emails.
So I’m looking for a candidate that’ll have to fight and bargain with Congress, not one for which Congress will just be a rumber-stamp.
Frankly, Scott, that is the single biggest factor that should scare the living hell out of people. Can you imagine what a Democratic president would do with a filibuster proof Democratic Congress. I shudder to think.Â
The current Congress has ABYSMAL approval ratings. And yet in voting for Obama, people will essentially be voting for carte blanche for that same horrid Congress.
deadrody,
If you can assure me that it won’t be a filibuster-proof Dem congress I’d be less enthusiastic for voting McCain. But how President’s are elected and Congress is is different and I can’t rest on that assurance.
Totally agree with you on that. You have to take a 2 pronged approach. Vote FOR the GOP in Congress AND for McCain. That way, hopefully, we end up with gridlock. Sad that gridlock is about our best hope this election season.
It’s odd that anyone would vote for McCain after he stated that his campaign would be shifting the focus of his campaign from the economy to attacking Obama. That is ALL I need to know about the man. That tells me that he is more interested in winning the election than he is in figuring out the current economic mess and how to help the middle class. In fact, he never once mentioned the middle class in either debate. This economic mess can be blamed on both sides. I guess my question is, if this was all CLinton’s fualt – as I’ve seen in print – then why, from 2000 – 2006 when the Republicans controlled the executive and legislative branches of government, didn’t they reverse Clinton’s horrible mistake? I don’t think anyone has a good answer to that question, but I’m certainly open to hearing one if someone has one!
BTW, this "horrid congress" has not had the fillibuster-proof majority to override the REPUBLICAN president. so it may be useful for some of you to learn about how Congress works. Maybe it won’t be so puzzling to you as to why the Dems haven’t gotten anything done.
And the American people have NOT forgotten that it was the Republican president and Republican congress that has put this country in such a bad position.
Don’t worry, the Dems will brinng prosperity, peaec and wealth to our country….you can find something else to pretend to be astonished by! Afterall, it can’t do any worse than the Republicans have!!!
Have a wonderful darn tootin’ day there, you betcha’!
Oh, if you’re so worried about Obama picking judges who will follow the Constitutioin, how come you weren’t  upset when Bush did away with Habeus Corpus? (I know, you don’t really have an answer to that.)
Bottom line, it’s the Dems turn….so squeel all you’d like, it’s our time and we’re going to take control, time to "get over it!!!"
that was a good post, Eric.
And here’s why I won’t (probably) be voting for Obama. Some of the top three reasons are touchy feely stuff.  But so be it.Â
Not enough experience, in life, and politically.  Leadership requires wisdom and intelligence. Obama only brings half.Â
I don’t like extremists in government, be they left or right wing. Based on his voting record in IL and in the US Senate, Obama is the most extreme left wing candidate we’ve seen since 1972.  On the other hand, many Republicans don’t like McCain because he goes against the party so often.  IMO, that’s a feature, not a bug.Â
Obama is the product of the most corrupt political environment in the country.  Maybe that’s guilt by association. And maybe that experience could even be a BENEFIT in dealing with a country like Russia or Venezuela. But I don’t want that taint and mistrust associated with our president. Arizona politics are wide open and damn near honest to a fault.Â
And I could talk about how the future of the world is in Asia, and why I think john McCain is the best guy for dealing with that.  And our 2nd amendment rights.  And a desire for a smaller government, with lower taxes.  And more personal responsibility. And just leave me the hell alone….. But that’s enough for me.
Solvency of the Entitlements fundamentally requires economic growth. Simply being able to "pay for" them through taxation is not sufficient. The desired goods and services must be available for purchase.
Without economic growth, the whole thing falls down.
On the other hand, we could always just shoot the oldsters.
I’m voting for McCain, as opposed to voting against Obama. I think Obama is easily the best thing to happen to the Democratic party in a long time. It’s remarkable that he beat the Clintons.
Having said that, he is truly a young man in a hurry. He has accomplished nothing to merit being the most powerful man in the world, leading the greatest country in the world. Despite our flaws (there are many), we truly are the last, best hope for mankind. I still truly believe this, even though, politically, I’m a mushy middle type.
Obama, and large Dem majorities in Congress will be bad for the country. They already have political monopolies in the inner cities, which are wrecked.
Myself, I think McCain has earned it. Yes, he is old and cranky. But, he’ll be great on National Security and cutting pork barrell spending, so I choose him.
HankB
It’s odd that anyone would vote for McCain after he stated that his campaign would be shifting the focus of his campaign from the economy to attacking Obama. That is ALL I need to know about the man.
Well, we may be voting alike, but I think the above is a poor rationale. If the positions were reversed wouldnt you be praising Obama for "speaking truth to power" or "taking the fight to McCain" or whatever? Look, McCain has every right to try and actually win the election. Voters will decide if they like the strategy or not. So far, they don’t, but its pretty strange to assert that negative campaigning is somehow inherently proof that McCain is unfit to serve. Or that theres some magic ratio of negative/non-neg campaigning, above which a candidate suddenly ceases to be fit for duty.
Aziz:
You are too kind to memory hole. It’s not just "poor rationale" that memory is demonstrating it is pure partisan vitriol. I am sure memory did not get up in arms when Obama ran an ad attacking McCain as being too old and out of touch to understand email. No, somehow Obama can do that and people like memory will still talk about what a pure and positive campaign he is running.
As in all things, memory sees what he wants to see and disregards the rest. To say one campaign is more "negative" than the other really does nothing but demonstrate ones’ partisan bias. Believe me, from my perspective I agree with Cindy McCain that Obama is running one of the nastiest campaigns in history. McCain probably is too. But that’s not why I’m voting for McCain or against Obama. And its not why memory hole is voting the way he/she is either.
CosmicConservative’s last blog post..Toon of the Day
That tells me that he is more interested in winning the election than he is in figuring out the current economic mess and how to help the middle class. In fact, he never once mentioned the middle class in either debate. This economic mess can be blamed on both sides.
He can’t fix or change anything unless he wins, so I think that should be his focus. I don’t recall if he used the words "middle class" in either debate, but it doesn’t matter. He has made references to "working Americans", so I think that would be the same thing.
 Obama’s church believes that people should disavow "the pursuit of middleclassness" (that’s part if their "Black Value System" – very interesting policy), so I take his references to the middle class with a grain of salt. Of course, I guess Obama never saw or heard that either.
Yep, memory hole is correct, McCain never said "Middle Class". He said "Middle Income" which only further proves how much of a scum-bag he is.
I mean, everything else McCain says (or does not say) does, so why not that?   /sarcasm
Comments on this entry are closed.