When I read things like this story, I want to vomit. It’s 2008 and the Supreme Court is reviewing movies to determine if their content is acceptable or not.
McCain-Feingold, the infamous campaign finance “reform,” has been an absolute travesty, and an all-out assault on the First Amendment. Not to mention that it’s also made our campaign funding system far more byzantine, confusing, and unaccountable. It has been corruption of the worst sort, and it should be abolished.
Instead we’ll have the courts deciding what movies we can or cannot watch.
Campaign Finance “reform” has been a complete disaster from the moment it was signed into law. But it has the word “reform” in its title so it must be okay, right?
{ 3 comments }
Eventually McCain-Feingold will go down to a Constitutionally mandated and well-deserved death. If it takes the Supreme Court ruling on movie ads to make it happen sooner I say somebody start suing over Stone’s "W" and let’s get it going on.
J.A. Eddy’s last blog post..The Election Is Over At Last!
Right on J. A. Isn’t this an opportunity for the court to examine McCain-Feingold under the light of the Constitution?
Hasn’t the Supreme Court already ruled that McCain Feingold was constitutional?
We’re talking about the same people who just figured out what the Second Amendment means, and even now, only 5 of the 9 Justices get it.
The Rich Wasp’s last blog post..A Question For My Hoosier Readers
Comments on this entry are closed.