Heh.
I understand Rendell’s point though. I really do. He deserves a little razzing for the line is all.
(And yes, you have to click the link to figure out what I’m talking about. I know, I know, it’s all kinds of work…)
Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.
Heh.
I understand Rendell’s point though. I really do. He deserves a little razzing for the line is all.
(And yes, you have to click the link to figure out what I’m talking about. I know, I know, it’s all kinds of work…)
{ 4 comments }
It is sexist to say that she is good for the job because she is unmarried and has no children.
It is not sexist to say that Palin was bad for the job because she and her husband had a bunch of kids.
Got it. War is peace, slavery is freedom, yadda yadda yadda.
phelps,
i think you’ve got it mixed up.
a democrat said that napolitano was good for the job because she had no children. Â a republican said that was sexist.
a democrat said that palin was bad for the job because she had too many family obligations. Â a republican said that was sexist.
where is the war is peace, slavery is freedom paradox here? Â it’s all totally internally consistent.
If you assume that the media are Democrats, then yes, you are correct.
???
Comments on this entry are closed.