I’ve long criticized the Single Motherhood by Choice movement for ignoring the importance of fathers and the two-parent family. To learn more about the problems with the Single Motherhood by Choice movement, see my co-authored column Are Single Mothers the ‘New American Family?’ (World Net Daily, 9/28/06) and my debate on Fox’s nationally-syndicated Morning Show with Mike and Juliet here.
Now we apparently have a trend towards Single Fatherhood by Choice–single men using surrogates to have children and build a family. From CNN’s Single men turning to surrogates (12/23/08):
Jeff Walker says from as far back as he can remember, he always wanted to be a father.
“It was always something I knew, from the time I was a child.” Just like his 3-year-old daughter, Elizabeth, who says she wants to be a mommy someday, Jeff says, “I knew I wanted to be a daddy.”
Walker, a Manhattan music executive, says he and his partner had talked about adopting a baby years ago. But after three emotionally draining, failed attempts at adoption, they decided to turn to surrogacy. They contacted Circle Surrogacy, a Boston agency that specializes in gay clients. Their child was conceived with a donor egg, and then the embryo implanted in the surrogate, or carrier.
After Elizabeth was born, Walker and his partner separated. He then made a critical decision — to become a dad again, single, and by choice.
“I realized my family, my two-dad family was going to look different than I thought it was going to look,” he said. Without a partner, he would face even steeper challenges raising Elizabeth and a sibling alone. Walker says he gave the decision a lot of thought.
“That was the only part that was really controversial, because I do think there are a lot of challenges that single parents face, but at the same time I felt I was capable of handling those challenges,” he said.
His second daughter, Alexandra, was born two years ago to the same surrogate, implanted with an egg from a different donor.
Walker, 45, is one of a growing number of single men — both gay and straight — who are opting to become fathers alone, with the help of gestational surrogacy.
Surrogacy experts say because the practice is not regulated, many surrogacy arrangements are handled privately by individuals. Precise figures are hard to come by, but experts say there’s no doubt the United States is experiencing a surrogacy baby boom.
Celebrities like Ricky Martin and Clay Aiken announced this year they had had babies with the help of surrogates and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, representing scores of reproductive clinics, reports that the number of gestational surrogate births in the country quadrupled between 1996 and 2006…
Walker and other men are willing to pay well over $100,000 to have a baby through surrogacy — the final cost depending on the number of IVF treatments necessary and how much is paid by insurance…
Steven Harris, a New York malpractice and personal-injury attorney, says he gave up trying to get married when he realized his primary motive was to start a family.
Harris, 54, says he knew he made the right decision after 21-month old Ben was born.
“I thought getting married was the only way to go, because I did want a family. But having Ben, I feel complete now,” Harris says.
I think the article misses the main reason why men (or straight men, anyway) want to have children through a surrogate–so they can be assured that they won’t lose the child upon divorce or separation.
A woman can have a child and know that unless the situation is exceptional or she behaves outrageously, she’ll always be a regular part of her child’s life.
For men, being a father is a roll of the dice–if mom decides she doesn’t want you around anymore, it can be hard to preserve your relationship with your child. The article doesn’t mention this, in part because some of the ‘Single Fathers by Choice’ are gay men, and in part because fathers losing their kids isn’t something the mainstream media likes to talk about.
My overall opinion? I can absolutely understand why a man would want to have a child through a surrogate, thus ensuring that he’ll always be able to be a father to his child. Still, I can’t condemn Single Motherhood by Choice and turn around and applaud Single Fatherhood by Choice.
I believe that mothers are just as important for children as fathers, and that it’s wrong to have a child as a single dad and deny the child a mother. What’s needed is not a Single Fatherhood by Choice movement but instead a powerful Shared Parenting movement to ensure that both parents’ right to their children is protected after a divorce or separation.
The CNN article cites Ricky Martin as an example. I discussed Martin in my blog post Sorry Ricky Martin, but Women Shouldn’t Create Single Parent Households–and You Shouldn’t Either


{ 12 comments }
Glenn,where is the evidence that the "main" reason men are choosing single fatherhood by choice is due to a desire to avoid losing the child in a custody battle?
I really wish all you bloggers would make a resolution to check your facts before swarming the internet.
The mother of Clay Aiken’s child has a name – Jaymes Foster. She & Clay intend to raise their son together. To identify her as a surrogate is insulting and demeaning.
This information isn’t hard to find. Check any People online article regarding Clay and his family – it’s all right there. He also did a 2-part interview with Diane Sawyer on Good Morning America discussing their lives together.
Please be more responsible.Â
Well, I would think the endless stream of evidence that this is exactly at happens to so many men would be enough for you there, Zach. Most men who love their kids KNOW they can lose them if the mother decides she wants to interfere. It’s just reality, I’ve seen it time and time and time again over the last 20 years myself among my father friends who got divorced, only to be treated like a stalker, a psychopath, and a bum for wanting to spend time with their kids (which is something that is the child’s right, by the way, not just the father’s).
Now, without doubt, some fathers in this situation are fools, because they don’t realize they CAN fight for their children’s rights. In other cases, they simply don’t know how.
Dean,
I understand that all of those things are real issues, and I’m not attempting to argue or belittle any of that. Â I’m narrowly questioning Glenn’s assertion that the main reason for men to choose surrogacy or single fatherhood by choice is due to custody fears.
Sessions,
maybe you should find fault with the quoted CNN article, and not with Glenn – who doesn’t even mention Clay in the part of this post that he authored.
Well, that’s a good point; I think Glenn’s probably right on that point, but I must admit I can’t say I KNOW he’s right on that point. It would require some way of doing a serious survey of men who do this.
zach,
Glenn published the CNN article in this blog. Should he check all his references for factual content before posting them?
Ummm, yeah.
Inaccuracies once removed are still inaccuracies.
So whatever happened to this post ?
i.e.      http://www.deanesmay.com/2009/01/02/in-her-own-words-a-dec-19-email-from-christine-maggiore/
Was it a functional loss by the thought police ?
I have no idea. Seriously.
Sessions,
To clarify, what I was getting at was more that since Clay doesn’t figure at all in the point Glenn is making, but rather is buried deep within an article Glenn is excerpting for other reasons, why are you coming down on him?
Dean,
what makes you think that Glenn is right? I’m not saying he’s wrong, but if I had to guess, I’d guess that surrogacy would be the choice for men who either want to be single by choice simply because they don’t want a wife, or else can’t find the woman they want and are sick of waiting. Sort of the standard reasons that get cited by single mothers by choice. Custody issues may factor in for some, but it seems a stretch to me to suggest that it’s the dominant factor. I’d be willing to be convinced otherwise, but haven’t seen much evidence circumstantial or otherwise. Certainly none is presented in this article, which was my main gripe to begin with.
Well, there’s the Marriage Strike Movement to start with. Then there’s just all my experience with men who’ve been burned on divorces and ripped away from their kids. I’ll tell you honestly that, after the pain of separation (which is still intense pretty much daily with me), while I’d be interested in having another kid or two (I’d love to have a daughter), I’m still pretty gunshy and am afraid of the very thought of getting married again. I wouldn’t pay a surrogate, as I have issues with that and think it’s a bad idea, but if I have to admit the thought is still rather attractive.
I think we really have here is only a bunch of anecdotal evidence. I doubt any firm study has been done on the question. On the flip side, Glenn’s pretty obviously writing an opinion column here, so it shouldn’t be necessary to demand absolute and unequivocal raw numbers–especially as they probably don’t exist anyway. So you can find it a reasonable speculation or not. It’s an op-ed statement.
that’s fair enough.
Comments on this entry are closed.