<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/</link>
	<description>Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167377</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167377</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ipso facto, sheâ€™s a Republican, she must be dumb and unqualified.&quot;

If you guys are really still trying to lay the blame on the media for Palin, you&#039;re still fooling yourselves.Â  

She really was a mess, and she really was unqualified: not because she was stupid, or because of her resume, but because she came across as woefully uninformed and unprepared at nearly every term: a patron saint of the know-nothing/not-interested-in-knowing anti-intellectualism that has for some reason taken over what used to be the party of whip-smart intellectuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Ipso facto, sheâ€™s a Republican, she must be dumb and unqualified.&quot;</p>
<p>If you guys are really still trying to lay the blame on the media for Palin, you&#8217;re still fooling yourselves.Â  </p>
<p>She really was a mess, and she really was unqualified: not because she was stupid, or because of her resume, but because she came across as woefully uninformed and unprepared at nearly every term: a patron saint of the know-nothing/not-interested-in-knowing anti-intellectualism that has for some reason taken over what used to be the party of whip-smart intellectuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167367</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167367</guid>
		<description>then wouldn&#039;t it have been more compelling to link such an article where mitchell&#039;s reporting of facts or news reporting was obviously colored by her opinions (on display in the Rose interview)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then wouldn&#8217;t it have been more compelling to link such an article where mitchell&#8217;s reporting of facts or news reporting was obviously colored by her opinions (on display in the Rose interview)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Price</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167366</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167366</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Because that perception colored her coverage the entire campaign, as such inevitably must, and was often repeated as though it were fact.Â  My objection is to the notion that we have an &quot;objective&quot; press corps which just happens to be 90% Democrats.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because that perception colored her coverage the entire campaign, as such inevitably must, and was often repeated as though it were fact.Â  My objection is to the notion that we have an &quot;objective&quot; press corps which just happens to be 90% Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167365</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167365</guid>
		<description>Dave,

while I more-or-less agree with Dave S.&#039;s pile-on post above, I have to say I don&#039;t see what you&#039;re talking about wrt the Newsbusters link.Â  Isn&#039;t it obvious that the Rose interview is Mitchell&#039;s opinion?Â  Where is any of this being presented as &quot;news&quot; or as fact?Â </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>while I more-or-less agree with Dave S.&#8217;s pile-on post above, I have to say I don&#8217;t see what you&#8217;re talking about wrt the Newsbusters link.Â  Isn&#8217;t it obvious that the Rose interview is Mitchell&#8217;s opinion?Â  Where is any of this being presented as &quot;news&quot; or as fact?Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fallen Glory &#8212; Dean&#8217;s World</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167354</link>
		<dc:creator>Fallen Glory &#8212; Dean&#8217;s World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/2009/01/10/memes/#comment-167354</guid>
		<description>[...] on Dave&#8217;s post about confirmation bias in the professional press, I thought I&#8217;d share an interesting post with you and add a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Dave&#8217;s post about confirmation bias in the professional press, I thought I&#8217;d share an interesting post with you and add a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

