New York Times AIDS Denialism On Dead Orphans Reaches New Lows

by Celia Farber on January 30, 2009

in The AIDS Wars

If you read nothing else today, please read Liam Scheff’s harrowing, incredible, sardonic, seething yet solidly documented assessment of the attempt to put the Incarnation Children’s Center elephant under the NYT magic carpet that has now managed to air-brush 80 dead guinea pig children from its perfumed pages:

READ THE STORY HERE.

Word on the street here in New York is that the African American community and Parents Rights Groups, as well as groups fighting against human experimentation are going to be taking this one to the streets. This is an absolute blood-boiling, racist, eugenics, AIDS-deranged nightmare and if you don’t think so then I don’t think you and I will ever get along. Where is the triumph in having a black President if we, as Americans, are sitting by idly while African American orphans are trapped, experimented upon, tortured, killed, buried in mass graves, and having their deaths be air-brushed out of reality by our very “paper of record?”

Read and weep. Or better yet, read and DO something. If you ever wondered what “AIDS Denialism” really is, here you have it, in full horror. I make no apologies for “hyperbole.” Scheff has documented the entire crime for all to see for themselves.

{ 1 trackback }

Tramadol.
February 12, 2009 at 8:06 am

{ 10 comments }

1 Dean Esmay January 30, 2009 at 6:43 pm

Scheff will undoubtedly be called  "conspiracy theorist," be accused of saying "the entire medical establishment is lying," called a "pseudoscientist" and/or "irresponsible."

Those are all bullshit of course, but they’re great ways to detract from the issues. No one but a tiny, tiny handful of the research community has to lie for this to be true, and of that tiny handful most could be deluded. There needs be no “conspiracy.” The general medical community most certainly cannot be held to blame.

This sort of garbage response is exactly what certain people do to anyone who has doubts about Global Warming, by the way; it helps them avoid actually having to face the issues head on. It’s very convenient: if you’re not a scientist, they say anything you say or ask about just proves you’re ignorant and ill-informed. If you are a scientist, but not in the same field as them, you’re also ignorant and ill-informed. So, the only scientists whose opinions matter are those who are paid to do all the research, and only other scientists within their field are ever allowed to check or approve their work.

Great system if you can get into it. It ain’t science, but it appears to pay the bills for a lot of folks.

The only difference with AIDS is that they’re allowed to call people child murderers and worse if they have any doubts that the science has ever been solid on HIV. And HIV has a decade’s start on all the political promotion, with full bipartisan support.

Sad, really, but we can’t expect most people to think like scientists, nor can we expect that everyone paid to act like a scientist will actually do so.

2 Dean Esmay January 30, 2009 at 6:43 pm

(I fixed your link, Celia. Let me know some time if you want to know how to do it, it’s easy.)

3 Mc Kiernan January 30, 2009 at 8:51 pm

Word on the street here in New York is that the African American community and Parents Rights Groups, as well as groups fighting against human experimentation are going to be taking this one to the streets.

Can you kindly tell us just what that is supposed to denote ?

The report was released on January 28, this year and already the street people have the bad news.

By the way, Liam’s 2458 subjective/biased word spasm could possibly be tempered to truth by reading the Full Report.

It’s only 508 pages and about 155,000 words which L. Scheff appears to have condensed rather dramatically.

THE EXPERIENCES OF NEW YORK CITY FOSTER CHILDREN IN HIV/AIDS CLINICAL TRIALS

Its always good to have ALL the facts, isn’t it.

4 willem January 31, 2009 at 12:06 am

It’s time for a Federal Grand Jury. This recent outrage may be just the spark to free our oft-forgotten Fourth Branch of Government so it may be set loose upon the other three to hunt down the sycophants stained by the blood of these innocents. Let no stone go unturned; no peer-to-peer network go unchallenged. Let the light of RICO shine down upon them all. If there is to be Justice, let there be a Federal Grand Jury set to the task. Let that be the mantra from here on out. In the matter of AIDS, Inc., the time for a Federal Grand Jury has come.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/scotus-on-the-unique-power-of-grand-jurors/

5 Celia Farber January 31, 2009 at 12:07 am

McKiernan,

Stop being cryptic. What do you mean to say, exactly? What was Liam biased about and what did you find that was reassuring in the 508 page report?
Vera Sharav at (Alliance For Human Research protections) AHRP.org came to exactly the same conclusions that Liam did.
What do you mean "tempered to truth?"

Please, please spill the beans, every last one, that will help spell out the difference between what Liam Scheff, Vera Sharav, myself and countless others have fumingly gleaned from reading this 508 page three million dollar whitewash, and what you have gleaned that makes you sleep so much better. 
Three million dollars, and the Department Of Health did NOT turn over any of the children’s medical records, so it is known how many died at ICC (80, before, and after the trials) and in the absence of medical records it is magically concluded that NOT ONE child died from any of the black box AIDS drugs, which NYT manages to transmute into NO dead children…and yet it is LIAM, who you find to be in error?
Explain please. Details please. What do you mean?
6 Dean Esmay January 31, 2009 at 12:15 am

McKiernan is always cryptic. Always. And is usually quite antagonistic when he does it.

I’ve learned to just chuckle. It’s kinda fun once you get used to his ways.

Dead kids don’t matter. Transparency of data don’t matter.

I give McKiernan credit for one thing though: he didn’t actually say we believed in a giant "conspiracy" that had "the entire medical industry" and "all of science" in “collusion.” I guess he’s tired of those lies too. So all he’s got left is to point to a 500+ page report and suggest that somehow, in some way, Mr. Scheff must have reported something wrong. Never mind what, that’s not important.

I’m past being angry. I’m just tired, and wondering how much longer this charade is going to go on.

Seriously, don’t try to use logic on the man. If you can find anyone on this blog who has EVER succeeded with that, I will reward you handsomly.

7 Mc Kiernan January 31, 2009 at 1:01 am

Excuse me:

Perhaps, some have misread my comment.

Kindly read:

(What precisely was cryptic about asking a question ?)

Word on the street here in New York is that the African American community and Parents Rights Groups, as well as groups fighting against human experimentation are going to be taking this one to the streets.

Can you kindly tell us just what that is supposed to denote ?

It seems that bridge hasn’t quite been crossed just yet.

8 Dean Esmay January 31, 2009 at 1:04 am

All you have to do is read the linked article. Yeesh. Couldn’t be bothered?

9 Mc Kiernan January 31, 2009 at 1:33 am

Excuse me,

The question is directed to Celia. We patiently await HER reply.

Thank you

10 Celia Farber January 31, 2009 at 11:57 am

Mc Kiernan,

Sure. I was referring to street protests, outside the various institutions who are culpable in this. 

Comments on this entry are closed.

traffic stats