Final Thoughts – Battlestar Galactica

by Kevin D. on March 22, 2009

in battlestar galactica

Last week I said I’d be here for the finale and while Dean beat me to the punch on making a post about the episode, I want to wrap up my long-running series with a front page post. I pray you’ll excuse this indulgence.

Spoilers are contained below…

I think the show went out in much the same way it presented humanity: Noble if imperfect.

I believe there were missteps in the way it presented the narrative. I believe some of the flashback sequences interrupted moments of great drama in exchange for very little revelation. I believe many of the flashback scenes could have been cut and the episode would have been tighter for it and they’d have made an interesting addition to the DVD cut.

Flashbacks are a tricky beast and the only show I can think of that does them well is Lost. Also, I found them to be a bit of a writer’s cheat on Ron Moore’s part. For example, we have the scene in the finale where Boomer hands Hera over to Athena and she tells Athena to tell Adama that she kept her promise. I’m asking myself, “What promise?”

Then we get a flashback of Tigh and Adama talking to Boomer when she’s a rookie on Galactica. Thing is, it took me a moment to realize it was Boomer and not Athena. That moment removed me from the drama. And it existed only to provide context for Boomer’s promise. I didn’t know about any promise because no promise had ever been made up until this point. We needed a flashback to fill in for a gap that could have been avoided altogether by simply letting Boomer’s choice to return Hera to stand on its own.

So, structurally and narratively, my biggest complaint about the episode are the flashbacks.

I thought the action scenes were well constructed and beautiful. The effects shots, like always, are jaw dropping.

The revelation of Head Six, Head Baltar, and Starbuck as angels was very interesting. It would have been nice to get some information as to why God (yes, I know it doesn’t like to be called that) chose one of its angels to come in the flesh while two others stayed invisible to everyone else. I’ve noticed some cries of deux ex machina but in a show that deals as heavily as it does in prophecy and spirituality it seems a bit hollow to be a stick in the mud about that. In the Battlestar Galactica universe (and our own by extension depending upon your point of view) God is a real being that has an active influence upon the setting. It seems a bit strange to be willing to acknowledge that there is a God, it has agents active in the world trying to carry out its will, but it’s all really the writer covering up for his shortcomings. What, we can’t have stories that feature an active god now? Or is it simply deux ex machina when the story does something you don’t think it should? Reminds me of all those cries of “jumping the shark” a few years back.

Really, can’t a show simply do something you don’t like, something that isn’t for you, without there being something intrinsically wrong with the property itself?

If I hear “deux ex machina” or “jumping the shark” one more time from someone that cannot admit that all media produced doesn’t have to conform to their sensibilities, I’m gonna stab them in the face with a spork.

Anyway…

I am confused about one thing relating to Starbuck though. Over and over again we’re told that Starbuck will lead humanity to its end. That didn’t seem to occur unless I missed something. Did I miss something?

Then there’s everyone in the fleet deciding to chuck all their ships into the sun. This doesn’t bother me in the least. Think about all the stuff these people have seen in the past few years, the fulfillment of prophecy, catastrophe after catastrophe escaped, the odds of them surviving at all, and the lessons learned and, yeah, I think more than a few of them would be willing to, as Adama said, wipe the slate clean. I believe the implication being that not just the main characters have grown, but the men and women of the fleet have grown as well.

Speaking of main characters, I’d like to have seen one of them die. And Roslin doesn’t count. We knew she was going to die. One of the great things about Battlestar Galactica was its ability to keep the audience on edge because it made us believe anyone could go at any moment. I would have liked to have seen that in effect at the end. Yes, the Chief offed Tory but, really, did anyone care? She was borderline a villain anyway.

About Roslin. I’ve long made it known that both Adama and Roslin are my favorite characters. So, appropriately, I shed tears when the end finally came for her. I think that’s the third time this program brought tears to my eyes. The first was when Baltar encounters Gina on the Pegasus, and the second was when Dee killed herself.

It may seem like I get choked up, if not weep like a girl, a lot but I approach television, movies, and books differently than I suspect most people do. In fact, I know I do. To put it plainly, the writer doesn’t have to work to get me emotionally invested. If I’ve decided to put down $8 for a movie, whatever for a book, or 1 hour for a television program, I’m going to do whatever it is I have to do to get everything I can out of it. And for me, it’s not demanding the writer to drag me kicking and screaming the entire way. It’s saying to the writer, “Dude, I’m here. Bags are packed. Where we goin’?”

So, moments that break the heart of a character are very well likely to get me choked up too.

And this brings me to the flash forward of 150,000 years and the, what some people are calling, anti-technology and anti-science message of the episode (if not the show). I think if you want to see that the show certainly gives you the tools to do so. However, I believe it hearkens back to Lee’s statement, “Our brains have always outraced our hearts, our science charges ahead, our souls lag behind.” The show acknowledges that man is both mind and soul and too often one leads the other when both should be pulling mankind forward with yoke shared.

Head Six observes our own commercialism and decadence and I believe it’s not an inaccurate observation. All powers fall. The United States is not immune to this simple fact of history. But history also teaches us that powers as strong as the U.S., powers that cannot be defeated militarily, will therefore fall from within. No one wants to think of their generation as the generation which will tip the scales but shouldn’t the question be examined? Shouldn’t the trend be fought will all vigilance?

Or will we, as most will do, simply say, “You’re being irrational. People have always said their generation is the most corrupt,” and then pass the problem on to the next? Thing is, eventually, the question will get passed on to a decadent generation and they too will look at us and pass the warning along because, surely, it could not be them. And then it’s too late.

At what point do we stop and address what we can when we can?

Battlestar Galactica was always about stopping the cycle. If we don’t stop for a moment and look at ourselves soberly, why should the next guy?

I was going to spend some time on episodic storytelling vs. novel-like (Babylon 5) storytelling but it doesn’t seem as important now so I’ll close as I began.

The finale, the entire show, was as it said humanity is: Noble but imperfect.

{ 1 trackback }

Topics about Ships » Final Thoughts - Battlestar Galactica
March 22, 2009 at 11:09 am

{ 11 comments }

1 Derek March 22, 2009 at 9:22 am

They hybrid proclaimed, “You are the harbinger of death, Kara Thrace. You will lead them all to their end. End of line.”

She brought them all to a dead planet, Earth1. And that brought the humans and cylons togther, which brought them to their ultimate end on Earth2.

Perhaps our error is in assuming that “bring them to their end” must be a negative end.

2 Dean Esmay March 22, 2009 at 2:26 pm

What I find interesting is that people on both the right and the left are often convinced society is decaying/falling apart/going to hell in a handbasket. Usually they’re more strident about it when their favorite politicians are out of power, but otherwise there’s not much difference, in my view, from the “environmentalist” shrieking that we’re destroying the Earth and the religious figure who claims we’re drowning in a cesspool of immorality. I suppose both viewpoints are useful in that they help keep us on our toes, but what I always ask is what they base that view on besides anecdotes. If they have information that’s more than anecdotal, I usually sit up and take notice.

Nevertheless, in a work of fiction–especially a good one–you’re going to have themes and philosophical ideas. The idea that technological and financial growth has moved faster than spiritual and intellectual growth fits in very well with the themes about human nature that have predominated throughout this series’ run–and, bonus, will tend to play well to pessimistic sensibilities in general. Although I liked the optimistic note at the end. ;-)

3 Kevin D. March 22, 2009 at 7:39 pm

“If they have information that’s more than anecdotal, I usually sit up and take notice.”

But what would that look like? I mean, short of something glaring coming up, the point it that the problem is a gradual trend. Things never look all that different from previous generations, or that which does look different can certainly be argued always into meaninglessness, but the fall does eventually come.

I don’t think you’ll ever find what you’re looking for on a graph or in a study. We both know either can be constructed in such a way to reveal whatever one wishes them to reveal.

So, it seems, Dean, that perhaps you’re part of the generation that will pass the problem on to the next. The evidence you ask for will never coalesce in the way you want it to.

If evil were easy to see, plain as day, everyone would stand against it. But evil isn’t always like that. And you seem to want it to be plain as day – you won’t accept anecdotes.

Sorry but evil doesn’t wait for the next Rasmussen poll to telegraph its plans. 1 Thessalonians 5:1-6 tells the Believer that the world will be exclaiming peace when the end comes.

The information you’ll want won’t exist – and still the end will come.

And that’s the point.

4 BillINDC March 22, 2009 at 7:43 pm

What, we can’t have stories that feature an active god now? Or is it simply deux ex machina when the story does something you don’t think it should? Reminds me of all those cries of “jumping the shark” a few years back.

1. Not all media must conform to my sensibilities, hence the vigorous market for a Sex and the City movie.

2. I can’t speak for everyone who employed the term, but my mention of deux ex machina pertained to 1. improbably shoehorning events and characters to recreate historical events to cheap effect throughout the series, and 2. an ending that, in order to explain the folks settling on prehistoric Earth w/o leaving a trace, had a bunch of space refugees from a holocaust decide to collectively ditch all technology (presumably including soft toilet paper) and launch it into the sun.

In contrast, the use of “Angels” technically fits the definition of deux ex machina exactly, yet in the end defies it, because the “hand of God” was written as an ongoing theme of the series for quite some time. So it actually makes sense.

While part of me thinks the angels ending was so-so, another part thinks it was kind of interesting. Can’t make up for ditching the Charmin and the lame flashbacks, however.

5 Dean Esmay March 22, 2009 at 9:27 pm

Kevin: “Gradual” tends to be pretty easy to spot if you’re looking at a time and place over decades or centuries rather than days or months.

Homosexuality a sin? Well the Bible makes it pretty clear that it is one, although it’s not clear to me just how grave it is compared to things like adultery and divorce and masturbation. So it then becomes a simple question: are faggots blowing each other and butt-fucking each other more often than married couples are getting divorced and cheating on each other today, and 13 year olds are jerking off? Yes or no?

From my perspective, this really isn’t hard. We have all kinds of tools available to us today to help us answer these questions, actually. Moreso than anyone in Moses’ day, anyway.

6 Kevin D. March 22, 2009 at 9:40 pm

Dean,

I can see you’re taking my point seriously… I mean, with the language you’ve chosen? How could you NOT be taking me seriously? It’d just be crazy to suggest otherwise!

Bill,

The flashbacks were lame. I’ll give you that. I think they should have been cut entirely.

7 Yu-Ain Gonnano March 23, 2009 at 12:45 pm

I don’t know, Kevin.

How many people would remember Baltar’s jail cell confession of growing up on a farm at Baltar’s “I know about farming” breakdown.

I like the scenes. The finale was about endings and beginnings. It was nice to see how many of these people made such inconsequential decisions that bring them all the way from the humdrum of their prior lives all the way to a new planet and a new life “a million miles from home”. Lee joined the military to pay for college, Adama stayed in because he couldn’t stand having to prove his integrity, Rosalyn because she decided that there had to be something more to life (and grief) than a “fun time” with a younger man. Baltar because of “the things we do for love… well, you know.”

Are these decisions the work of God to bring about it’s will. Or after having the luxury of surviving are they just post-hoc rationalizations for “Why me?” I think it’s intended that we don’t/can’t know.

8 GaryLaPointe March 23, 2009 at 1:44 pm

I really enjoyed the episode.

But they really didn’t need the child, they already had the answer, so that seemed a little anti-climactic. And the flashbacks were over done.

I was really glad Baltar joined them in the end, prophesy-wise he had to, but they always could have gotten him there some other way.

Even though I understood (and on many levels I agree), I thought the driving all the tech into the sun was stupid. What if they discovered after a few months they were allergic to the planet or that summer was only 2 weeks a year or something else bad about the planet (or gave away something else they needed).

So was Kara an angel too? If not, what was she?

And lastly, with all the knowledge those 30,000+ people had I think society would have evolved way past where they had it 150,000 years later. It was way too long of a timeline (IMHO).

There is no way they would have ignored all sorts of things like: the wheel, fire, tools, farming, bows/arrows, building. That’s not even factoring more complicated things: medicine, extracting metals, engines, computing, etc.

And the fact that they found Hera’s DNA felt anti-climactic too. Even though she had been the first human/cylon DNA

9 krontekag March 23, 2009 at 10:28 pm

Awful.

I loved the series (for me the best two episodes were the mutiny eps, S413 + 14), but hated that ending. It looked to me like everyone just gave up.

As for the merits of throwing away your technology to go bush – I suppose in an idyllic swoon everyone may have forgotten about the debilitating effects of bad weather, disease, predators, warfare with the natives, and the general discomforts of operating as hunter gathers or mud-hut settlers without any of the the necessary skills – but I find it hard to believe that all 38,000 would have been as stupid as that.

It all came across as some sort of green fantasy. The reality is, such a decision would have resulted in a short, nasty and brutish life.

As for the spiritual dimension – it just didn’t wash. The whole “Opera House” routine seemed contrived, and I get the feeling they had a lot of hard work to try and tie in all the luscious dream-sequence imagery they had peppered the series with into some sort of coherent denouement. It was a big ask, and it didn’t work for me.

At the time I watched it, I went progressively through the stages of whistful sadness, mild irritation, dissapointment, and finally flat out anger that my intelligence was being insulted.

10 MikeLyons March 24, 2009 at 3:31 am

krontekag,

As for the merits of throwing away your technology to go bush – I suppose in an idyllic swoon everyone may have forgotten about the debilitating effects of bad weather, disease, predators, warfare with the natives, and the general discomforts of operating as hunter gathers or mud-hut settlers without any of the the necessary skills – but I find it hard to believe that all 38,000 would have been as stupid as that.

Yeah, I did have a bit of a problem with that. we have 38,000 humans and Cylons and not even 1%, the crew of a ship, decided to tell Lee “Hey, Frack off. We don’t have any ability to live in stone age times and we’re not going to do it.”

Failing that, why didn’t some of these people start rebuilding a modern society from stone age materials? It would take generations, but with education of the following generations some small part of the new colony would have been able to get it up and running, say, within 100 years.

I chalk it up to Moore wanting to get from A to B; from the BSG storyline to “They are our ancestors” so he can give his moral lesson for the series, that of Human Hubris gone out of control.

BTW, there was more than one #8 which landed on planet, or so it’s safe to presume, why aren’t they “Mitochondrial Eve” but Hera is?

11 Yu-Ain Gonnano March 25, 2009 at 4:40 pm

Because Mitochondrial Eve is the “Most Recent” maternal common ancestor. #8 would be *a* maternal common ancestor, just not the most recent one.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Roku.com-The Little Black Box That Streams Thousands of Films! WordPress MU, WPMU and BuddyPress plugins, themes and support at WPMU DEV Thesis Theme for WordPress:  Options Galore and a Helpful Support Community
traffic stats