Dig a hole, fill it in

by jaymaster on June 3, 2009

in Politics

Is this any different from the text book, worst case public works example of paying one person to dig a hole, and then paying someone else to fill it in?

GM Lobbyists

{ 1 comment }

1 David Foster June 4, 2009 at 10:13 am

Yes.

Digging holes & filling them in is not particularly attractive work; hence, people will not seek it out unless they have little alternative.

Working as a lobbyist/lawyer/consultant for a government-controlled company doesn’t involve getting hot and sweaty and (strangely) can even carry high prestige.

Hence, the current bailout distorts human capital allocation much more than does the hole-digging-and-filling and is considerably worse for the long-term health of the economy.

Comments on this entry are closed.

traffic stats