His tirade against Fox News would some have some semblance of coherence if it at least made a pretense toward intellectual honesty.
What’s most distinctive about the American press is not its freedom but its century-old tradition of independence—that it serves the public interest rather than those of parties, persuasions, or pressure groups.
What’s most distinctive about the American press is the extent to which they’ve become the cheering section for left-liberalism. This is not merely right-wing paranoia (or in my pro-choice pro-legalization case, libertarian paranoia); numerous studies and journalists confirm the media’s rampant sinestrophilia.
All industries suffer from some form of self-selection bias. Women are more likely to become nurses and teachers, men are more likely to work in construction and hard labor, conservatives are more likely to choose a military career.. and left-liberals are more likely to become journalists, something Weisberg should understand.
To merely complain about a political view he disagrees with is his just and noble right as an American, but for the author of a book called The Bush Tragedy to sanctimoniously call for all right-thinking people to ignore the top-rated cable network because they’re illegitimately biased:
Whether the White House engages with Fox is a tactical political question. Whether we journalists continue to do so is an ethical one. By appearing on Fox, reporters validate its propaganda values and help to undermine the role of legitimate news organizations. Respectable journalists—I’m talking to you, Mara Liasson—should stop appearing on its programs. A boycott would make Ailes too happy, so let’s try just ignoring Fox, shall we?
The only word to describe such total lack of self-awareness, my friends, is hilarious.
UPDATE: Jay Nordlinger points out CNN also has newspeople. Does Anderson Cooper sound objective?
CNN has those, too. One of the CNN anchors is Anderson Cooper — he’s their star, as I understand it. The hurricane guy. When the “tea party” protests got going earlier this year, Cooper interviewed David Gergen. Gergen said, “They [Republicans and conservatives] still haven’t found their voice, Anderson. This happens to a minority party after it’s lost a couple of bad elections, but they’re searching for their voice.”
Then Cooper said, “It’s hard to talk when you’re teabagging.” He said this smirkingly.
He was referring to a sexual practice defined by the Urban Dictionary as follows: “the insertion of one man’s sac[] into another person’s mouth.”
Would a Fox News anchor ever, ever say anything like this — ever? Can you conceive it? But that is what CNN anchormen do, apparently. When people tell you that CNN is a real news network, whereas Fox isn’t — I would just smile at them.
Don’t just smile, Jay. Laugh. Guffaw. Collapse on the floor in tears of pure unadulterated hilarity.


{ 9 comments }
So, I’ll repeat myself again. The surest sign of the zealous ideologue is their complete inability to recognize their own manifest irony.
This is so typical of the left that it’s hardly newsworthy.
Every actual non-partisan study of the news networks has repeatedly shown that Fox News is more balanced than CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC. And MSNBC is so overtly partisan that it’s laughable to even refer to them as a news network.
All of them are biased. Fox is biased to the right, but not nearly as much as the other mainstream media outlets are biased to the left.
The problem is that when you and everyone you know have the identical bias, you simply can’t see the bias. It’s invisible to you.
Hah! The expression “cognitive dissonance” comes to mind:
Writing a long-winded tirade about FoxNews with the take-home message that we should ignore it!
Foxnews is, indeed, biased. But, it is no more biased, than the NY Times.
Them are the facts!
–HB
Independence is cooperarting with the White House.
Propaganda is disagreeing.
We have always been at war with East Asia.
“What’s most distinctive about the American press is not its freedom but its century-old tradition of independence”
I’d say I was surprised a journalist had such a staggering ignorance of history, but I saw Wolf Blitzer (a guy alleged to have a history degree!) on Jeopardy, so I know better.
http://gawker.com/5362580/wolf-blitzer-lost-on-jeopardy (you have to see this to believe it – I won’t even try to describe it).
Fox is closer to the political center than any other TV news operation. That’s why their ratings are so high.
Oh, and another point:
Foxnews is a bit biased BECAUSE of the NY Times’ gross slant to the left and dereliction of its duty.
In the dark ages before MTV and the internet, there was the NY Times, Washington Post, ABC, CBS, and NBC — and not much else. The NY Times was the king of the pitch — and they blew it.
–HB
J1,
That’s funny, when I wrote this I was all set to caption this with that photo of Blitzer at -4600 points, but I decided people would either confuse Blitzer with Weisberg, or (worse) assume I had.
Every actual non-partisan study of the news networks has repeatedly shown that Fox News is more balanced than CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC.
Er, not quite.
I believe those surveys you’re talking about have been strictly to analyze the NEWS and REPORTING side of Fox News. It excludes all commentary. So if you have Sean Hannity ranting for an hour, with two or three five minute news break interruptions by reporters, they’re only counting those hard news segments.
The same, by the way, turns out to be true for… National Public Radio. When analyzed strictly on news reporting, leaving aside all commentary, NPR is one of the fairest and most balanced. But of course anyone who listens to them knows where their commentators are coming from: almost invariably from the center-left (and sometimes not even so center).
The same, by the way, turns out to be true for… National Public Radio.
But not ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, NYTimes, LATimes,……
Their bias is in both commentary *and* news.
I don’t disagree. Again if we’re simply talking about independent studies that look at the matter, it does turn out that when you’re talking strictly *news* coverage, Fox News and NPR actually do top the list for being least biased.
On the other hand, I don’t see how anyone can watch the Fox News Channel and fail to notice that most of their time on the air is not devoted to news coverage. It’s just not. Instead their time is overwhelmingly dominated by people like Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and a host of others who *do* have axes to grind and may make a show of trying to be fair but no one can doubt where they’re coming from and “unbiased news coverage” isn’t it. Defenders of Fox News are here relying on those news segments at the top of the hour, every half hour, etc. that go on for five minutes at a time. But then it’s back to another long series of advocacy by the (non-reporter) host.
Special Report used to be the best hour of news and analysis on the air. I haven’t seen it since Brit Hume left though.
Comments on this entry are closed.