<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shakespeare 1, Monkeys 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deanesmay.com/2009/12/05/shakespeare-1-monkeys-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/12/05/shakespeare-1-monkeys-0/</link>
	<description>Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:24:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin L. Shoemaker</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/12/05/shakespeare-1-monkeys-0/#comment-180146</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin L. Shoemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/?p=18067#comment-180146</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It&#039;s infinite monkeys.&lt;/a&gt; And if you have any real understanding of infinity, it&#039;s self-evidently true. The proof is mathematical, not experimental. Any attempt to &quot;prove&quot; it experimentally is doomed to failure, unless your budget is infinite dollars, your number of subjects is infinite monkeys, and the length of your study is infinite days. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem#Real_monkeys&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The University of Plymouth blew 2,000 pounds.&lt;/a&gt; All that they really learned is that MediaLab Arts students, the Arts Council, and the zoo&#039;s scientific officer need to learn more math.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem" rel="nofollow">It&#8217;s infinite monkeys.</a> And if you have any real understanding of infinity, it&#8217;s self-evidently true. The proof is mathematical, not experimental. Any attempt to &#8220;prove&#8221; it experimentally is doomed to failure, unless your budget is infinite dollars, your number of subjects is infinite monkeys, and the length of your study is infinite days. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem#Real_monkeys" rel="nofollow">The University of Plymouth blew 2,000 pounds.</a> All that they really learned is that MediaLab Arts students, the Arts Council, and the zoo&#8217;s scientific officer need to learn more math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Dean</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/12/05/shakespeare-1-monkeys-0/#comment-180144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/?p=18067#comment-180144</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the phrasing is regional? I&#039;ve lived in Northern California all my life, and I&#039;ve always remembered it as &quot;If an infinite number of monkeys sat at an infinite number of typewriters . . .&quot; I don&#039;t think I ever heard it using &quot;a million monkeys.&quot; 

Or perhaps it&#039;s generational? I&#039;m not sure of your age, but I just turned 40 this year. God help me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the phrasing is regional? I&#8217;ve lived in Northern California all my life, and I&#8217;ve always remembered it as &#8220;If an infinite number of monkeys sat at an infinite number of typewriters . . .&#8221; I don&#8217;t think I ever heard it using &#8220;a million monkeys.&#8221; </p>
<p>Or perhaps it&#8217;s generational? I&#8217;m not sure of your age, but I just turned 40 this year. God help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/12/05/shakespeare-1-monkeys-0/#comment-180140</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Esmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/?p=18067#comment-180140</guid>
		<description>What fascinates me about the &quot;million monkeys&quot; thing is that I really think that in the original formulation, the word &quot;million&quot; is used loosely to mean &quot;an unimaginably and absurdly high number.&quot; I think if it was &quot;an infinite number of monkeys,&quot; no one would bother arguing with it, y&#039;know? I never thought the phrase literally meant 1,000,000,000 monkeys precisely.

That said, the exercise is still worth doing. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What fascinates me about the &#8220;million monkeys&#8221; thing is that I really think that in the original formulation, the word &#8220;million&#8221; is used loosely to mean &#8220;an unimaginably and absurdly high number.&#8221; I think if it was &#8220;an infinite number of monkeys,&#8221; no one would bother arguing with it, y&#8217;know? I never thought the phrase literally meant 1,000,000,000 monkeys precisely.</p>
<p>That said, the exercise is still worth doing. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Scott Eiland</title>
		<link>http://deanesmay.com/2009/12/05/shakespeare-1-monkeys-0/#comment-180133</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Scott Eiland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanesmay.com/?p=18067#comment-180133</guid>
		<description>Bob Newhart had a short monologue once about the infinite monkeys hypothetical, with Newhart playing the role of one of the many workers assigned to see what the monkeys were producing.  After a few comments to the effect that he didn&#039;t think some of the monkeys would ever produce anything, he apparently struck paydirt:  &quot;Hey, get over here--I think this is famous or something!&quot;

[pauses, then begins to read]

&quot;To be, or not to be--that is the gzortnplatt.&quot;

[Audience laughs, routine ends]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Newhart had a short monologue once about the infinite monkeys hypothetical, with Newhart playing the role of one of the many workers assigned to see what the monkeys were producing.  After a few comments to the effect that he didn&#8217;t think some of the monkeys would ever produce anything, he apparently struck paydirt:  &#8220;Hey, get over here&#8211;I think this is famous or something!&#8221;</p>
<p>[pauses, then begins to read]</p>
<p>&#8220;To be, or not to be&#8211;that is the gzortnplatt.&#8221;</p>
<p>[Audience laughs, routine ends]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

